点击右上角
微信好友
朋友圈
请使用浏览器分享功能进行分享
“Z世代”就业观：青睐多元个性 不抱“铁饭碗”******
中新网海口1月11日电 (记者 张茜翼)随着新年来临，各地掀起招工热潮，海南省“2023年春风行动暨就业援助月”专项服务活动11日在海口启动，81家企业提供2000多个岗位。记者采访发现，“Z世代”成为招聘会上的主角，他们拥有更强的自我意识，择业多元个性。
投递简历，咨询岗位……“00后”陈丝现场与两家企业达成初步就业意向。“毕业后，我的第一份工作是销售，但现在我想尝试更多可能，于是转行加入短视频行业。”陈丝说，从个人角度来说，她更看重自己的兴趣爱好，希望能在工作中实现个人价值。
数字化网络和社会的发展进程越来越快，大量“Z世代”向社会流动，他们更青睐于按照自己的生活节奏去选择接受就业。
2001年出生的沈从君此前经历了考研失利，然而她很快调整状态，加入了求职就业的“队伍”。“我首先考虑感兴趣的岗位，其次是未来的发展前景。”沈从君说，充足的专业知识储备和沟通协调能力是她的优势，大学期间多次去企业实习的经历，让她在面试时更有底气。
沈从君称，相比于“铁饭碗”，“Z世代”更追求工作体验，愿意把兴趣爱好变成工作，她身边的朋友通过在抖音和小红书上发短视频走红，从而获得可观收入。
海南省“2023年春风行动暨就业援助月”专项服务活动11日在海口启动。图为招聘会现场。 张茜翼 摄做自己热爱的事，正在成为许多“95后”的就业选择。海南24岁小伙云天泽在招聘会现场寻求文化传播公司的岗位。云天泽说，“现在大家都说年轻人喜欢‘躺平’，但是我身边的同龄人都很努力，不少都是‘斜杠青年’，业余时间主动学习，非常‘内卷’。”
海南双成药业股份有限公司招聘负责人王丽喆在招聘中发现，“95后”更有主见，择业观更加个性化。“这一代年轻人生活在信息爆炸的时代，有更多机会看到新就业形态的兴起和发展，且更倾向于将个人价值的追求与职业融为一体。”
海南省“2023年春风行动暨就业援助月”专项服务活动11日在海口启动。现场开展“直播带岗”。 张茜翼 摄“‘Z世代’的思想更加自由开放，也为企业注入更多活力。”海南银达国际餐饮管理有限公司招聘负责人冼慧玲表示，“Z世代”的学习能力和接受新事物的能力更强，企业非常需要这样具有创新精神的年轻人。
现场还有企业招聘负责人认为，新一代年轻人的择业观也让企业重新审视，如何将企业文化、人文环境做优做好，给予员工尊重和成长空间，与年轻人共同探索职场新生态。(完)
中新网评：处理核污水绝不是日本自家私事****** 中新网北京1月19日电(蒋鲤)日本政府近日称，将于2023年春夏期间开始向海洋排放经过处理的福岛第一核电站核污水。日本罔顾国内民众及周边国家的屡屡反对，企图将核污水“一倒了之”，把一件关乎全球海洋生态环境和公众健康的事当成了自家私事。  资料图：日本福岛第一核电站。2011年，福岛核电站事故发生后，大量放射性物质泄漏到大气层和太平洋，对周围环境造成了难以逆转的伤害，数十万人被迫撤离该地区。时至今日，作为日本邻国之一的韩国仍未解除福岛海鲜禁令。 日本以核污水存储能力即将达到上限为由，在2021年4月13日，正式决定将福岛第一核电站核污水排入太平洋。过去一年多，日本政府和东京电力公司一直在持续推进核污水排海计划。 日本政府辩称，这些核污水经多核素处理系统(ALPS)处理后很安全，甚至“可以喝”，这样的表态无疑在愚弄大众。 事实上，经过处理的核污水仍含有多种放射性物质，核污水一旦排放入海就无法回收，长期来看，将会给海洋生态带来难以估量的潜在威胁，最终危害人类健康。 因此，核污水排海计划推出后，遭到日本民众强烈反对。日本《朝日新闻》2022年3月公布的问卷调查显示，福岛县、宫城县和岩手县受访的42个市町村长中，约六成反对东京电力公司福岛第一核电站核污水排放入海。日本全国渔业协会联合会也多次申明立场，反对该计划。 日本政府认为，核污水排海是最便宜、最省事的解决方案，但此举却将周边国家乃至全世界置于核污染风险中。太平洋非日本一家之海，核污水会随着洋流流动，其影响势必会跨越国界，危害周边国家乃至整个国际社会的公共福祉和利益。 《韩国经济新闻》发文称，相关研究认为，福岛核污水如果排放入海，约7个月后将到达济州等韩国海域，该国水产业和旅游业将遭受相当大的损失。 德国南极海洋机构也曾发出警告，若日本将所有核污水排入海中，不到半年，整个太平洋都将面临高度辐射威胁，包括远在大洋另一端的美国。太平洋地区人民更是对日本该计划持反对意见。 日本作为《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国，有义务保护海洋环境。然而，在核污水排海方案的正当性、核污水数据的可靠性、净化装置的有效性、环境影响的不确定性等问题上，日本未能作出科学、可信的说明。 国际原子能机构技术工作组虽已三次赴日实地考察评估，但尚未就日排海方案的安全性给出结论，并且对日本提出诸多澄清要求和整改意见。在此情况下，日本仍执意推进核污水排海工程建设，这是极不负责任的行为。 太平洋不是日本的下水道，日本必须正视各方合理关切，在与周边国家等相关利益方和国际原子能机构充分协商后，制定合理的核污水处理方案。日本也要着眼长远，若只顾眼前，执意将核污水排放入海，不仅其自身，周边国家乃至全世界都将为之买单，其后果必将会危害数代人。  Fukushima water disposal by no means Japan’s own business By John Lee (ECNS) -- Japan has announced it will release treated wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean this year. Although Fukushima wastewater disposal affects global marine ecological environment protection and public health, Japan has turned a deaf ear to domestic and international opposition to dumping the contaminated water into the sea, treating the "global" matter as its own business. The Fukushima accident in 2011 had sent large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding environment, and hundreds of thousands of people were forced to evacuate the area. South Korea still maintains its import ban on Japanese seafood from areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster. On April 13, 2021, Japan announced it had decided to discharge contaminated radioactive wastewater in Fukushima Prefecture into the sea due to dwindling storage space, with the Japanese government and plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. promoting the release plan over the past year. The Japanese government argues that the water treated by an advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, is safe and drinkable, which is undoubtedly fooling the public. In fact, the treated wastewater still includes a variety of radioactive substances and can’t be recycled once discharged into the sea, which will pose a great threat to marine ecology and ultimately endanger human health in the long run. Therefore, the discharge plan has been strongly opposed in Japan. According to a questionnaire conducted by The Asahi Shimbun, nearly 60 percent of mayors of 42 municipalities in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures oppose the discharge plan. The National Fisheries Cooperative Federation of Japan has also repeatedly stated its opposition in public. The Japanese government believes that dumping Fukushima wastewater into the sea is the cheapest and most convenient solution, but neighboring countries and even the whole world will be at risk of nuclear pollution. The Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan and the wastewater flow along oceanic currents will surely break boundaries and endanger public welfare and the interests of neighboring countries and even the international community. The Korea Economic Daily reported that related research concluded that if contaminated water from Fukushima is released into the ocean, it would only take seven months for the contaminated water to reach the shores of Jeju Island, with the country's aquaculture and tourism suffering considerable losses. According to the calculation of a German marine scientific research institute, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within half a year from the date of discharge, and the U.S. and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. People in the Pacific region also oppose the discharge plan. As a participant of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan has the obligation of protecting the marine environment. However, it hasn’t offered a full and convincing explanation on issues like the legitimacy of the discharge plan, the reliability of data on the nuclear-contaminated water, the efficacy of the treatment system or the uncertainty of environmental impact. Though the IAEA has yet to complete a comprehensive review after three investigations in Japan, the Japanese side has been pushing through the approval process for its discharge plan and even started building facilities for the discharge. It is rather irresponsible for Japan to act against public opinion at home and concerns abroad. The Pacific Ocean is not a private Japanese sewer. The country must seriously heed the voices of the international community and make a reasonable plan for the Fukushima wastewater disposal after full consultation with stakeholders and international agencies. If it only seeks instant interest and insists on discharging the contaminated water into the sea, not only itself, but also its neighboring countries and the entire world will pay for the decision and several generations will be forced to bear the consequence. 
|
)